Match Play Championship

HHGS MATCHPLAY IS BACK

The final games for the 2020 Match Play Shield and Plate were played at Banyan on the 7th February.

For 3rd and 4th places for the Plate, Bea Wallace was beaten by Hallbjorn Stenhaug, pictured below

3rd and 4th places for the Shield were played between Tim Vermeersch and Bjorn Byman, Byorn is pictured below.

The final result for the plate finals and the road there is as follows:

In 2nd place was Jean Luc Sauvinet, pictured here with the winner, Tim.

The draw for the Shield Finals and the road there is as follows:

Eric Taylor was beaten by an on form Piawan Khonjam, who shot well below her handicap. They are pictured below receiving their prizes.

And here are the two winners together, well done to you both:

7 Replies to “Match Play Championship”

  1. It would appear from the conditions of the competition that competitors can play a match concurrently with a stableford. Please confirm.

    1. Dickie

      Yes they can – as they choose – previous years have given us a number of comments about being able to do this and it helps players to enjoy the full 18 holes. Only down side is the removal of the normal “gimme” putts in Match Play

      Tim

      1. Tim
        There are reasons why the playing of a match concurrently with Stroke play was never done, one important reason being that it was against the rules of golf. See below. Note, rule before 2019.

        33-1. Conditions; Waiving Rule The Committee must establish the conditions under which a competition is to be played. The Committee has no power to waive a Rule of Golf. Certain specific Rules governing stroke play are so substantially different from those governing match play that combining the two forms of play is not practicable and is not permitted. The result of a match played in these circumstances is null and void and, in the stroke play competition, the competitors are disqualified.

        Rules do change but regarding match & stroke the rules remain so substantially different that it would be impractical to attempt to combine the two. If a player applied certain rules during a match it would result in the opponent suffering severe penalty in the stroke play competition, and vice versa. This could lead to disharmony ( or worse ) between the players, something we should endeavor to avoid. Please note that the “gimmee” issue is a minor problem which can be addressed but other rules cannot be overcome.
        I appreciate the rationale behind the proposal but the implementation of such a competition could well be counterproductive. Please give the matter further thought.

        Regarding the proposed change to three quarter difference in handicap. This is against the C.O.N.G.U instruction that Full difference MUST be used. It is proven that three quarter difference hugely and unfairly favors the lower handicap in a match. In fact, full difference still favors the lower handicap. As the average handicap in the society is 18 / 19 Let’s have fair play and not be biased.
        Robert “Dicky” Bird

        1. Re ¾ handicap
          I agree Dicky`s argument, that to reduce handicap in match play, is unfair.
          If a player has a handicap eg. 28, his reduced hcp is 21. Respectively player with hcp 9, plays with 7.
          If we can play Stableford and Stroke play with full handicaps, though in two divisions, why not Match Play?
          Handicap in golf is a sensitive matter, but enables players of different playing skills to compete with each other. Both players have good and bad days and how often, is shown in their hcp´s.
          Kurre Westerling

  2. Great idea! Pity it is over Christmas. Cannot play day 2. But I understand you would like to have as many members here in HH as possible. Well done committee, hope many will participate!

  3. Robert, Kurre

    Thanks for your comments and would like to give you the following on behalf of the committee in response.

    Dual Competition
    You are absolutely correct Dickie and our thanks for highlighting this. The intent was a positive one to provide an extra incentive for sign ups as holding the 2 formats in tandem would allow all players to enjoy a full 18 holes no matter how the match play game went but as you now point out this is positively prescribed against and we will therefore change that.

    3/4 Handicap
    First can I point out that it appears Kurre has slightly misunderstood this – it is NOT 3/4 of the handicap of each individual player it IS 3/4 of handicap difference between the 2 players involved in each match. EXAMPLE – Player A has a 12 handicap and Player B has a 26 handicap. The difference is 14 shots and 3/4 of 14 is 10.5 rounded up to 11. Player A plays off zero and Player B plays off 11 shots.

    The decision to implement this was taken with full knowledge of the CONGU position which changed from using 3/4 handicap to full handicap some years ago. As the previous committee members well know when this was implemented in HHGS after the CONGU change there was an immediate impact in terms of low handicap (let’s say 10 and below) refused to sign up for the competition as it was perceived to create situations where low handicap golfers would be giving 2 shots on a number of holes when drawn against a high handicapper. This led to the unfortunate cancellation of the long established HHGS Match Play competition which is/was obviously detrimental to HHGS itself.

    Our intent is to popularize Match Play as an event and to encourage ALL members to participate – whilst High Handicappers outnumber Low Handicappers in the societies ranks the re-adoption of 3/4 difference (and as a committee we believe we CAN create formats for our own specific events) in our opinion “levels the playing field” and STILL allows the old saying “on any given day …etc etc” to hold true.

    Hope that answers the comments adequately and please understand this is for the good of HJHGS – letting long established competitions “slide” is something we MUST avoid if at all possible.

    Tim

  4. Hey ! I just noticed a silly statement, ” whilst High Handicappers outnumber Low Handicappers ”
    To some a 9 handicap can be considered high & a 20 handicap considered low . Think about it !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *